And being assembled together with them, He commanded
them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to wait for the Promise of the
Father, "which," He said, "you have heard from Me; for John truly
baptized with water, but you shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit not
many days from now."
Acts 1:4-5
I had a dream a few days after my recent return
from
India. The Lord was speaking to me, and the words echoed in my mind as I
awoke: "Get back to Jerusalem, you need to get back to Jerusalem." I
understood instinctively that I wasn’t to go to the literal city, but
rather to return to the spirit of the early Jerusalem church as recorded
in Book of Acts. In other words, we need to return to the basics of the
Christian faith, go back to the beginning and examine the foundations
anew, and determine if the various developments that we’ve embraced over
the years have been improvements or have actually made us less
effective.
This doesn’t seem to be a real issue to the zealous
evangelical or charismatic today. Of course, we’re modeling ourselves
after the biblical church—duh?! But a closer examination of the church
in modern culture might show that we’ve strayed from the simplicity of
Christ, we’ve adopted questionable methodology, and even teachings and
practices that have altered the actual character of our Christianity.
It’s always a challenge for the church to adapt to the cultural context
it finds itself in without changing the message and character of the
Gospel and the church that Jesus had in mind when he said,
"I will build
my church." Unfortunately, we sometimes embrace innovative ideas without
a great deal of prayer and thought as to how it might impact the
character of our ministry in the long run.
Modern examples might be the televised church
(complete with phony smiles, over-acting, and no dead-air time); the mad
race for numerical and financial success (the world’s standards, not
God’s); and the "seeker-sensitive" church which makes the Gospel message
more palatable to the unchurched and does away with potentially
offensive practices and teachings like a truly Spirit-filled service or
the biblical doctrine of hell. These are not just means of winning the
lost; they have changed the character and flavor of the American church,
and not necessarily in a good, spiritual way.
If we desire to get back to the biblical pattern, to the character and standards of the early church in
Jerusalem, what does this entail? What do we need to get back to? What
have we possibly strayed away from?
1. The
Jerusalem Church was
Jesus-Centered
And daily in the temple, and in every house, they did
not cease teaching and preaching Jesus as the Christ.
Acts 5:42
A popular worship chorus says, "It’s all about
You,
Jesus." Truer words cannot be spoken. The church of Jesus Christ is to
be Christ-centered—or maybe I should say "Jesus centered." The
Book of Acts refers to "Jesus" twice as many times as it does to
"Christ." There’s something more personal—and less religious—at least in
contemporary English, in saying Jesus rather than Christ. You can tell
if someone is really born again, if someone honestly knows God, by their
use of "Jesus" rather than a vague reference to a distant "God." I was
saved in the "Jesus Movement," and so were Peter and Paul, for that
matter—they kept the focus on Jesus.
The early apostles had been with Jesus just weeks
before. He was fresh in the memory, alive in their hearts in a way that
is probably difficult for us to imagine. They had faith for healing and
miracle-working, because they had been exposed to the supernatural
ministry of Jesus for the last three and a half years. They knew how
Jesus would react to a given situation, because they were thoroughly and
personally acquainted with Him—"WWJD" was not subject to personal
interpretation; they knew exactly what He would do because they knew Him
intimately.
The authority of the apostles came from this knowledge
of Jesus, and their intentional emphasis on being Jesus-centered. They
knew how he would respond to Gentile converts, meats offered to idols,
the ordination of deacons and elders, and the other steps that
circumstances required them to address. To this day, the church looks to
the apostles and their writings to determine what is right and
wrong—because of their relationship with Jesus Himself. They were the
closest to Him, and were/are more able to judge the wisdom of any
development or step of progress the church attempts to make. We need to
get back to Jerusalem and give heed to the words of those who
honestly knew "what would Jesus do?"
They also looked forward to His soon coming. "This
same Jesus…will so come in like manner," they’d heard the angel say.
They expected Him at any moment, and they worked feverishly to hurry up
the great event, hoping to bring the Gospel to every nation, thus
fulfilling the condition that Jesus Himself had set upon His return in
Matthew 24:14. Little did they dream that their precious Master would
tarry for 2000 years or more!
2. The Jerusalem Church
was Holy Spirit Powered
And being assembled together with them, He commanded
them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to wait for the Promise of the
Father, "which," He said, "you have heard from Me; 5 for John truly
baptized with water, but you shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit not
many days from now…
you shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you; and you
shall be witnesses to Me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and
to the end of the earth.
Acts 1:4-5,8
We should get back to Jerusalem and wait until we are
endued with power from on high (Luke 24:49). The early church was
Spirit-powered, Spirit-baptized, and Spirit-filled—that was the secret of
their success, the reason they impacted the people around them so
profoundly and were even accused of "turning the world upside-down."
(Acts 17:6). Multitudes were added daily to the church, not because
everyone had memorized two diagnostic questions and a five-step
presentation of the Gospel, not because the church had geared its
services to be more user-friendly, but because God was working with them
with signs following! (Mark 16:20).
Many churches today are struggling to recover from
bitter divisions, plagued by squabbling over the color of the carpet,
torn by people with carnal ambition fighting over who gets to do what,
and when. The church at Jerusalem was too busy doing the stuff, winning
people to Jesus and growing by leaps and bounds, to have the time to
engage in petty rivalry and other ungodly foolishness that
characterizes so many churches today.
If we were truly Spirit-filled and Spirit-powered the
world would sit up and take notice. If the lame were made to walk and
blind eyes opened, the church wouldn’t have to invest a penny in
advertising or promotion; the problem would be how to accommodate the
crowds that seemingly came out of nowhere. If biblical power was being
manifested in our services, the concept of becoming "seeker-sensitive"
would be outrageous—who’d want to settle for half the package?! Who’d
opt to be a second-class citizen in the kingdom of God when they could
be the recipients of supernatural blessing and divine favor?!
Many pay lip service to the Holy Spirit today, but few
have taken the time and made the effort to really invite Him to be in
control, to really be God in our midst, with all that that implies. We
need to get back to Jerusalem and wait on God until we are truly
Spirit-powered.
3. The Jerusalem Church
was People-Driven
Therefore those who were scattered went everywhere
preaching the word.
Acts 8:4
Spirit-powered and people-driven: that was the secret
of the early church. By people-driven,
I mean that the people did the lion's share of
the the ministry. The church grew without ambitious programs and
strategies to win the lost, without expensive mass campaigns, without
any official missionaries or emissaries actually being sent out until
Paul and Barnabus were commissioned by the church in Antioch. The people were
motivated, empowered, and apparently blessed and sanctioned by the
leadership to go out and bear fruit—and they did, by the bushel!
In some ministries today, the program is more
important than the people that run it, the "ministry" is more important
than the individuals being ministered to; people are expendable but the
show must go on. Pastors, evangelists and other leaders spend much of
their time thinking up new programs and new outreaches that might or
might not be effective, when statistics have shown, without change over
the past thirty years and more, that over 80% of all real church growth
is accomplished by Christians sharing the Gospel with their friends and
relatives. Billions of dollars are spent on evangelistic crusades and
evangelistic television and radio, yet only one percent of American
believers claim to have been led to the Lord by an evangelist. Pastors
are responsible for some six percent, and occasionally someone just
drops into a strange church, but the real credit has to go to
individuals reaching individuals for Jesus.
The church of Acts was also characterized by a servant
spirit among the people. Stephen and Philip didn’t care if anyone knew
what they were doing, or if the offerings were sufficient for their
needs—they couldn’t keep the good news of Jesus inside; it just tumbled
out and they effectively led hundreds to the Lord. They didn’t strive to
get in the pulpit, to get a microphone in their hand, to have a
"ministry"—they just ministered. The people went everywhere, and
everywhere they went they spread the word, and they did it without
worrying about human recognition. Someone has said that we could
accomplish a great deal together if we didn’t care who got the
credit—and that is just how the church in Jerusalem operated. It was
people-driven, and servant-driven at that.
Sometimes those of us with relatively smaller
ministries are made to feel inadequate, as failures, when we look at the
impressive machinery of the mega-church or the nationally-acclaimed
ministry. The truth of the matter is that God doesn’t judge success
the way we do; and for that matter, smaller churches are sixteen times
more effective at winning the lost, and also much more successful in discipling members than large churches.*
It’s not my intention for this article to be, "what’s
wrong with the church today," but rather, what could be right with the
church if we got back to basics, returned to the simplicity and
straightforwardness of the early church, and sought to emulate the
church at Jerusalem, which was…
Jesus-Centered,
Spirit-Powered, and People-Driven.
*Christian Schwarz, "Natural Church
Development and Paradigm Shift in the Church," published by ChurchSmart
Resources, 1997
Copyright ©
2005, Kim Harrington, Masterbuilder
Ministries. All rights reserved
Scripture quotations from the New King James Version, unless otherwise
noted
|